I was in two minds about uploading this, but I think it's important information.
This is a very controversial documentary focusing on leather tanneries and suppliers, specifically in Italy and China.
There is definitely a hidden agenda behind the production of this documentary, so just be aware of that.
I don't think either side of the argument is all good or all bad here. Nothing is black and white.
It is important for us all to stay informed on the current affairs of our craft, and where we buy our materials from. Your customers can also watch this.
With that said, enjoy the show:
So, thoughts on the subject?

@Fadi Fur is a really strange one that I get asked about on occasion.
The difference between leather and fur, is typically leather comes from skins taken from animals slaughtered for the meat industry. In essence it is a byproduct where the animal died primarily for food that as humans we need for survival.
Of course we don't need meat to survive, but the process is more emotionally palatable when something dies for sustenance sake.
Fur is typically the skin along with the fur taken from animals who have been slaughtered for their fur only, and the carcass of the animal is then discarded.
In essence the animal died for a luxury or fashion item.
Now here's where the lines get blurred.
As we know, some countries are big consumers of rabbit meat, China being one of them, France being another.
What you don't see in the documentary is the rabbit carcasses being dumped into a landfill, you can bet that those are going to be used for food over there.
In my mind, rabbit fur falls under the category of a food industry byproduct, probably more than crocodile, alligator, snakeskin, ostrich and toad - rabbit meat is definitely more popular in restaurants the world over than any of those.
However, mink, fox, raccoon, chinchilla, etc, are not knowingly a food byproduct, and this is what sparks the controversy.
But what if you found out that the carcasses of these fur animals were feeding poor people in China? Or going into pet food?
I have no idea if this is true, and I'm asking myself as much as anyone else.
When the lines get blurred, the argument of cruelty and the conditions the animals are kept in usually arises. But then, have you ever visited a commercial chicken or pig farm?
I believe we all have to make a decision on what we are comfortable using based on the second hand knowledge we are given.
Probably none of us have visited a fur processing plant, so we have to make a judgement call.
Notice they didn't show how they killed those rabbits in the documentary. Why?
It was right behind the guys pulling the skins off. You likely didn't see it because it wasn't horrifying enough for the program.
Likely they were dispatched with a bolt or shock.
But the last thing the producers want is for the viewer to think, 'oh, it wasn't as bad as I was expecting'.
As humans we are designed to compartmentalise everything, and we want to paint everything as black or white, where the truth of the matter is, it's all some shade of grey.
Luckily, fur doesn't tickle my pickle, so it's not a decision I have to make in my work. Would I wear a Canada goose jacket however? for sure.